Doing business in Italy?

If You are running a business in Italy or You consider opening one, just ask what we can do to support You. Send an email to info@eqst.it.

6/10/2015

Hotel value split among the RE Owner, the Hotel Operator and the Hotel Chain.

When assessing the Value of an Hotel we face an increasing complexity due to new legal structures among the various components of the Hotel business, including the Real Estate owner, the company managing the Hotel and the International chain that applies its label and its marketing support. This short articles deals with the splitting of the Hotel Value as a consequence of new legal structures among these players. Cesare Carbonchi reports from Milan, Italy.

One hotel, three owners
We are often involved in assessing the yearly performance and updating the current market value of an Hotel on behalf of International operators and real estate investment funds. We analyse the market trend, we prepare an economic model tailored to the specific situation and we analyse current performance and potential improvements. Planning includes full economic and financial projection for the Hotel that we use as a basis for the Hotel financial control and for the hotel valuation.
Finally we get to the “split” issue: the potential economic value of the Hotel as a whole is often split between the value of the Real Estate and the value of the company that manages the hotel, as these may be separated entities. The split clearly derives from the type of contract signed between the entity that owns the Real Estate and the entity that manages the Hotel: the higher the rent is, the higher the value assigned to the Real Estate portion and the lower assigned to the Hotel management portion.
In recent deals the situation is getting more complicated as we have a third entity: the large international hotel chain. Thanks to its well-known hotel brand, the international hotel chain enters into a marketing agreement with the hotel management to provide international reservation system, hotel management skills, financial control and system support. For these services the entity that manages the hotel pays the chain a remuneration based on a fixed amount plus a percentage based on sales and operating profit of the Hotel, with a vast case of different economic and contractual structures.
Going back to splitting the Hotel performance and value, we are therefore facing a complex structure. We deal with three entities that to some extend are all the “owner” of the same Hotel.

How do we assess the performance and the value?
The performance for the Real Estate investor is typically valued in the long term as we would expect some yearly cash performance after all taxes have been paid plus a long term asset capitalisation. The Hotel Valuation assigned to the Real Estate investor may be calculated as the NPV of the stream of cash flow deriving from the rent, taking into account operating expenses related to the Real estate, taxes, leverage plus a relevant portion as Terminal Value. Leverage and cost of debt is the key element to manage.
The performance for the hotel management company is typically valued on the short to medium term. Accurate monthly financial control is the key element: performance may change for minimum details such as what breakfast is served or the way room cleaning headcount is managed during week-ends. Hotel management and valuation is based on cash performance. Value may be calculated as the NPV of the FCF of the Hotel business, net of the rent paid to the Real estate owner and net of the cost of services paid to the Hotel chain.
We may also calculate the hotel performance and its value to the International hotel chain. It may be calculated as the NPV of the stream of services net of the additional costs that would be incurred to produce them. What is interesting to note is that this third piece of value is not totally visible, as it is not that easy to assess what the real value of the service is. The accounting principles used to value the goodwill associated to affiliated hotels may be different among large operators chains and may not be easy to read in their financial reports.

The conclusion
As a conclusion, today's Hotel management requires a complex economic and contractual structures that imply different financial control systems and financial valuations. The more complex the corporate and contractual structure is, the more attention we must pay in assessing what the economic and financial performance really is besides the usual RevPar and GopPar indicators. When coming to value assessment, we must estimate not only what the Hotel performance and value is but also to whom it really belongs.
Cesare Carbonchi